Legal Opinion

The De Gama

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided November 2, 1905No. 1,092PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Admiralty. Suit for collision.

1Opinion of the Court

TOULMIN, District Judge.

It is well settled that vessels engaged in commerce are liable for damage occasioned by collision on account of the negligence, want of care, or skill on the part of those employed in their navigation. But consequences of this kind do not follow, where the person committing the fault does not, in fact or by implication of law, stand in relation of agent to the owners of the colliding vessel. By employing a tug to transport their vessel from one place to another, the owners of the tow do not necessarily constitute the master and crew of the tug their agents in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. The Clarita and the ClaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. The" Civilta" and The" Restless"Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. French v. President, Etc., of Delaware & H. Canal Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The CromwellDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API