Legal Opinion

IN RE S.W.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 2015No. 12-FS-434PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:

This case presents a “rare” instance in which we conclude that “a self-incriminating statement was ‘compelled’ despite the fact that the law enforcement authorities adhered to the dictates of Miranda [v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 467, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).]” Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 444, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000). Specifically, we conclude that a juvenile’s confession during custodial interrogation was involuntary, in spite of an effectively delivered Miranda warning and a knowing and intelligent waiver of Miranda…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuinonesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  2. DAVID T. ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Lejeezan Toudle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API