People v. Mosby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Mercure, J.P. (dissenting).
As the evidence of the uncharged July 2005 drug .sale is not Rosario material and, regardless, could not have created a reasonable possibility of a different result at trial, we respectfully dissent.
Evidence constituting Rosario material is “[a]ny written or recorded statement . . . made by a person whom the prosecutor intends to call as a witness at trial, and which relates to the subject matter of the witness’s testimony” (CPL 240.45 [1] [a] [emphasis added]; see People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, 289 [1961], cert denied 368 US 866 [1961]; People v Feerick, 241 AD2d…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. FeerickNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.