Legal Opinion

Gish v. City of Roanoke

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 11, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Court' of Law and Chancery of the city of Roanoke. Decree for the defendants. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

The land involved in this suit is shown by the following diagram:

Mrs. Nannie E. Gish claims that she owns the land A, B, C, D. The city of Roanoke claims that it owns the land a, b, C, D, and that the land a, A, B, b, has been dedicated to and accepted' by the city as a public *521street. Mrs. Brophy, the owner of lot 4 claims that the land a, A, B, b, is a street or right of way appurtenant to her lot.

Prior to 1889, S. H. Gish and Nannie E. Gish were the owners of all this land and also of land to the south, east and north of it. In March, 1883, there was a map made by Skinker and Simpson,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lankin v. TerwilligerOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Marrow v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
  3. Bell v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Gaw v. HughesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Milliken v. DennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  2. Hamlin v. PandapasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Walters v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  4. Magee v. OmanskySupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. William S. Stokes, Jr., Inc. v. MatneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API