Legal Opinion

Bowman v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 18, 2016No. 1301130; A156919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order awarding assessed attorney fees under ORS 656.386(l)(a), which requires an award of “a reasonable attorney fee” in “cases involving denied claims where an attorney is instrumental in obtaining a rescission of the denial.” Here, an attorney fee of $6,000 was awarded after SAIF Corporation rescinded its denial of the claim shortly before the scheduled hearing on claimant’s challenge to that denial. Claimant argues, among other things, that the board erred in limiting its consideration of the attorney fee award to work counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jones v. OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Jones v. Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Brooks v. Tube Specialties - TSCO InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Taylor v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API