Legal Opinion

Honorbilt Products, Inc. v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, No. 335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

The plaintiff, Honorbilt Products, Inc., brought an action in assumpsit to recover from the defendant, City of Philadelphia, the sum of $5,191.51, representing taxes and penalties for the year 1953 alleged to have been illegally collected by the City under its Mercantile License Tax Ordinance of December 9, 1952, as amended. The ordinance imposed a tax of 3 mills on the gross volume of business transacted within the city by the taxable. The City filed an answer denying liability, and by stipulation the case was heard by the court without a jury on the complaint,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. National Biscuit Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Sablosky v. MessnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Philadelphia v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Pittsburgh Milk Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hopewell Township v. Schmidt, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1959
  4. Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API