Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Samuels

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1940No. Appeal, 364; Appeal, 307PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Linn,

These two appeals, argued together, involve the validity of an ordinance of Philadelphia, imposing a tax measured hy a percentage of gross receipts from the transaction which takes place when an automobile is parked in an open parking lot.

The city’s appeal, No. 307, brings up a proceeding in equity by Sley System Garages, a corporation organized under the General Corporation Act of 1874, P. L. 73, to restrain the city from enforcing the ordinance. A decree restraining the city was affirmed by the Superior Court; On the city’s application, this appeal was allowed.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Kelley v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Blauner's, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Murray v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Jones & Laughlin Tax Assessment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. National Biscuit Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Commonwealth v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Alco Parking Corp. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API