Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided June 30, 1992PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Judge.
The appellant, Ronnie Marshall, was convicted of murder in the first degree by a jury of his peers. He was sentenced to life in the Department of Correction.
The appellant contends that his constitutional rights to due process of law and a fair trial were violated because the State of Tennessee failed to furnish him exculpatory evidence within the meaning of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). He further contends that the trial court committed error of prejudicial dimensions in failing to require the State to present the statements of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Sadik Xheka and Beha XhekaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John E. McKenzie Dale Bonura and Stephen FarrarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- State v. ParkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- State v. RobinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. EdginTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Johnson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SpurlockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.