Legal Opinion

State v. Edgin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1995PublishedCited by 172 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

The appellant, Isaac Earl Edgin, was convicted by jury of two counts of aggravated rape. The trial court imposed a twenty-year sentence on each count, to be served concurrently, in the Department of Corrections.

On direct appeal, the Court of Criminal Appeals found that the State had violated the Brady 1 rule with regard to a certain statement made by Jl 2 and ordered a new trial in the count wherein Jl was the victim. The court affirmed, however, the conviction which grew out of Edgin’s conduct with J2.

In applying for review under Rule 11, Tenn.RApp.P, Edgin argues that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. State v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. State v. RobinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Johnson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. WorkmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. Tommy Nunley v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2018

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API