In Re Shaquille O'Neal B.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
Shaquille O’Neal B. (Appellant), a minor under the age of seventeen at the time of this proceeding in the family court, sought to remove his name from the South Carolina Sex Offender Registry. The family court found Appellant should be placed on the registry, and Appellant appeals. We reverse.
I. FACTS
On August 16, 2006, a Juvenile Petition was filed in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, alleging Appellant (DOB 4/5/91) had committed the offense of Indecent Liberties Between Children in violation of N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-202.2.
Appellant admitted the charge and was adjudicated delinquent by order…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. WallsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- In Re Ronnie A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Hendrix v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BeckerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lozada v. South Carolina Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Tant v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014