Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tant v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 28, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2012-206988; No. 27392Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Pleicones

I concur in the result but would adopt the following procedure should this circumstance arise again.

This case requires us to determine the appropriate procedure when the Department of Corrections seeks to increase an inmate’s sentence based upon the Department’s determination that it has misinterpreted that sentence. In my opinion, the onus for upward recalculations of sentences must be placed on the Department and not on the inmate, and the interpretation of the unclear sentence must be made by a judicial officer and not by an executive agency.5 I would therefore hold that when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ArchieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. In Re Shaquille O'Neal B.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API