United States v. Ekenstam

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Each accused was separately tried and convicted for violations of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, *17050 USC § 728. Except for the difference in time and place, all the specifications are the same. Representative is the following specification taken from the Ekenstam case:

“Specification 1: In that Thomas W. Ekenstam, commissaryman third class, U. S. Navy, U. S. Naval Communication Facility, Yokosuka, Japan, then seaman, did, on or about 10 February 1954, at or near Camp Zama, Japan, violate Article XV of the Administrative Agreement…