Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1892No. 16,391PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The first count of the information charges that “ Elijah Holland and Jose Holland, on the 2d day of May, 1891, at the county of Adams and State of Indiana, did then and there feloniously, unlawfully and wilfully employ and use in and upon the body and womb of Daisy Reynolds, a pregnant woman, as they the said Elijah Holland and Jose Holland then and there well knew, a certain instrument, with intent then and there and thereby to produce miscarriage, it not being necessary to cause miscarriage to preserve the life of said Daisy Reynolds, by reason whereof said Daisy Reynolds languished until…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kistler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Rhodes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. McQueen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hitch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lowry v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Fifth Avenue Savings Bank of Columbus v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API