Legal Opinion
Salsburg v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 5, 1953No. [No. 49 October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
Julius Salsburg, who was convicted by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County of bookmaking on horse races, is challenging here the constitutionality of Chapter 704 of the Laws of 1951, which amends the statutory rule of evidence known as the Bouse Act, Laws 1929, ch. 194, by adding a proviso that the Act shall not prohibit the admission of illegally procured evidence in Anne Arundel County in prosecutions for violations of the State gambling laws.
The Act was also amended by Chapter 710 of the Laws of 1951, which provides that the Act shall not prohibit the admission of such evidence in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Mulcahy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Givner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Mason v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.