Legal Opinion
N.E. Physical Therapy Plus, Inc. v. Commerce Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided October 14, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHand, J.
The plaintiff, N.E. Physical Therapy Plus, Inc. (“NEPT”), appeals the trial court’s allowance of defendant Commerce Insurance Company’s (“Commerce”) motion for summary judgment on NEPT’s claims under G.L.c. 93A, §!!.1 For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the summary judgment on count 1 of NEPT’s complaint, within which those claims are set forth.
Summary judgment may be granted only where there remain no genuine issues of material fact, and where the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 56 (c);LaLonde v. Eissner, 405 Mass. 207, 209 (1989);…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
- Duffy v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Genest v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Messere v. MessereMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
- Metro West Medical Associates, Inc. v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010