Legal Opinion

HIT, Inc. v. North Dakota Department of Human Services

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2013No. 20120299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] HIT, Inc. appealed a district court judgment affirming the administrative order requiring HIT to pay back excess reimbursements in the amount of $90,699.80. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] HIT, Inc. provides individualized supported living arrangements for indi*793viduals with developmental disabilities. As a provider, HIT receives reimbursements from the Department of Human Services for HIT’s direct service costs to conduct its programs. The reimbursement is provided before the services are rendered based on projections made by the provider. The goal of the projection is to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Martin v. Stutsman County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. North Dakota State Board of Medical Examiners—Investigative Panel B v. HsuNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Stein v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Northern Excavating Co. v. Sisters of Mary of the Presentation Long Term CareNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GEM Razorback, LLC v. Zenergy, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Albright v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. FarrellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API