GEM Razorback, LLC v. Zenergy, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VandeWalle, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] GEM Razorback, LLC appealed from a judgment dismissing its declaratory judgment action because GEM failed to exhaust administrative remedies, and dismissing its claim for specific performance because GEM could not establish that it was a third-party beneficiary of a contract. We affirm.
I
[¶2] GEM and Zenergy, Inc. owned working interests in two oil and gas wells located in McKenzie County. Zenergy operated the wells, but GEM had not consented to pay its share of the drilling and operating costs. GEM did not execute a joint operating agreement for the wells and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Apache Corp. v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Thompson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Zimmer v. BellonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Resources, Inc. v. Counce Energy BC 1, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Langved v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Garaas v. Petro-HuntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017