Henry E. Frankenberg Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
The question involved in this case is whether certain importations of metal beads are dutiable under paragraph 408 of the tariff act of July 24,1897, at thirty-five per cent, ad valorem, or at forty-five per cent, ad valorem under paragraph 193.
The collector assessed them at the latter rate. The petitioner protested. Upon submission of the protest to the board of general appraisers that' board sustained the collector. Its decision was successively affirmed by the Circuit Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals. 146 Fed. Rep. 63.,
The applicable paragraphs are respectively as follows: 408,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Heyliger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- United States v. Andrews Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.