Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Hirschberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rolando T. Acosta, J.
The court previously granted defendants’ motion, ordered the production of certain documents, and informed the parties that a more detailed decision would follow. The court now sets forth its reasons for granting defendants’ motion and hereby vacates and supersedes the August 8, 2005 short form order. Background
Plaintiffs are the targets of criminal and civil investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the New York State Attorney General’s Office (NYAG) allegedly for late trading in the mutual fund industry. In their complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Orco Bank v. PacificoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Bluebird Partners, L.P. v. First Fidelity Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- IMO Industries, Inc. v. Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C.New York Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Human Tissue Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Windsor Securities, LLC v. Arent Fox LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Aurora Loan Services, Inc. v. Posner, Posner & Associates, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Harrisburg Authority v. Cit Capital USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- 601 Realty Corp. v. Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.