Legal Opinion

601 Realty Corp. v. Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, EC., Angela Pantony, and Richard W Dawson appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated November 7, 2008, as denied their motion to compel the plaintiffs to respond to items 3 and 6 in their notice for discovery and inspection dated January 11, 2008.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the appellants’ motion to compel the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Orco Bank v. PacificoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Goldberg v. HirschbergNew York Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Siegel v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Soussis v. LazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Tso-Horiuchi v. HoriuchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API