Legal Opinion

Haymon v. Wilkerson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1987No. 86-1594PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

This appeal presents the issue whether, in the District of Columbia, a parent may sue to recover extraordinary medical and other health care expenses resulting from the “wrongful birth” of a child with birth defects. The trial court granted a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, SupeR.Ct. Civ.R. 12(b)(6), dismissing a wrongful birth claim brought by the mother of a child born with Down’s Syndrome. The child’s mother alleges that her obstetrician’s failure to counsel her properly regarding the advisability of performing an…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Wanzer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Lininger Ex Rel. Lininger v. EisenbaumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Atraqchi v. GUMC Unified Billing ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API