Legal Opinion
Atraqchi v. GUMC Unified Billing Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 2002No. 01-CV-217PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge.
Appellants Michael and Irene Atraqchi appeal from the dismissal of their pro se eivil action against Georgetown University Hospital (“Georgetown”); GUMC Unified Billing Services; and five treating physicians. 1 Their principal contention on appeal is that the trial court dismissed their lawsuit prematurely. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of count II of the Atraqchis’ amended complaint, which involves allegations of fraudulent billing. However, because count I fairly put the appellees on notice that the major claim was negligent medical treatment, rather than a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Scott v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bible Way Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ of Apostolic Faith of Washington v. BeardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Haymon v. WilkersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Fingerhut v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Oparaugo v. WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Davis v. Grant Park Nursing Home LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Ihebereme v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.