Legal Opinion

United States v. Clemente Valdovinos-Valdovinos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1985No. 84-1055PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States appeals from the dismissal of an indictment against Clemente Valdovinos-Valdovinos (“Valdovinos”). The government argues that the district court’s dismissal of the indictment because of outrageous government misconduct was improper. The government also contends that Valdovinos lacked standing to challenge the alleged outrageous practices of the immigration authorities. Because we agree with the government that Valdovinos lacked standing to challenge the conduct of the government, we reverse the order dismissing the indictment.

The challenged conduct raised by Valdo-vinos and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Rafael Santana and Francis FuentesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. United States v. Miguel Morales-QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API