Munoz v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
629 So.2d 90 (1993)
Manuel MUNOZ, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 78900.
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 14, 1993.
Rehearing Denied December 17, 1993.
Alvin L. Peters of McCauley & Peters, Panama City, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Laura Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
OVERTON, Justice.
This cause is before us to review State v. Munoz, 586 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the district court held that section 777.201, Florida Statutes (1987), abolished the objective entrapment test we set forth in Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.),…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Kogan; Concurrence · Barkett.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (97-2)Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Worley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.