State v. Frausto
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
[T1 Richard Andrew Frausto (Defendant) appeals from a conviction of Murder, a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-203 (Supp.1991). Defendant argues that the trial court committed plain error by failing to define terms in a jury instruction and failing to give the jury a supplemental instruction. Defendant also argues that because his trial counsel did not object to the trial court's failure to give a supplemental instruction, he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, Defendant argues that delays in his appeals process violated his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Homer Lee TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State v. PursifellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- United States v. William HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- State v. CouchUtah Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SalgadoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. BunkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. McManigalCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025