Legal Opinion
Sheppard v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 2010No. 09-AA-166PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner Elizabeth Sheppard has asked us to review a decision of the Compensation Review Board (CRB) that her claim for permanent partial disability (PPD) was not “deemed accepted” under D.C.Code § l-623.24(a-3) because that provision applies only to claims to initiate payment of disability benefits, while petitioner’s claim constituted a subsequent request for a different type of benefit than her initial claim. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order of the CRB.
I
On January 1, 1983, petitioner, Elizabeth Sheppard, who was employed as a health technician at D.C. General…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Atwater v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- MCM Parking Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- United Parcel Service v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jackson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sheppard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ross v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Frazier v. DC DOESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Sheppard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Sheppard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011