Legal Opinion

Water Rights of Wadsworth v. Kuiper

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 18, 1977No. 27177PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

The proceedings involved here are under the “Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969.” Section 37-92-101 et seq., C.R.S. 1973. The predecessors in interest to the applicants filed an application for an underground water right pursuant to section 37-92-302, C.R.S. 1973, being a proceeding for the right to withdraw, from a well, water tributary to a surface stream. Thereafter, the applicants named in the caption of this opinion succeeded to all interests of their predecessors. Later, a water referee upheld the use of the well and found that the source of its water was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitten v. CoitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'n v. Glacier View MeadowsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Hall v. KuiperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Hardesty Reservoir, Canal & Land Co. v. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Three Bells Ranch Associates v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Bar 70 Enterprises, Inc. v. Tosco Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API