Legal Opinion

Homestead Ins. Co. v. Ryness Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 2, 1992No. C 91-3611 FMSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

851 F.Supp. 1441 (1992)

HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiff,

v.

The RYNESS COMPANY, a California corporation, et al., Defendant.

No. C 91-3611 FMS.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 2, 1992.

James S. Greenan, Cooper White & Cooper, San Francisco, CA, for Homestead Ins. Co.

Raul V. Aguilar, Raul V. Aguilar Professional Law Corp., San Francisco, CA, Jon S. Heim, Jon S. Heim Law Offices, San Francisco, CA, for The Reyness Co. and Helen Moore.

David S. Secrest, Branson Fitzgerald & Howard, Redwood City, CA, for Thomas Prendergast, Teresa M. Lamb, Russell…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Safeco Insurance v. GilstrapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Previews, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. California Union Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API