Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Sears

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1945No. 15186PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

Passing over other questions raised by the general demurrer, we are of the opinion that the demurrer was properly sustained on the ground of laches. “Equity gives no re lief to one whose long delay renders the ascertainment of the truth difficult, though no legal limitation bars the right.” Code, § 37-119. “While most frequently the bar of laches is applied in instances where the long delay has rendered the ascertainment of the truth difficult, the doctrine does not rest on that premise alone. As was well stated in Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Ellis, 171 Ga. 717, 719…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Hadaway v. HadawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. McWhorter v. CheneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Cowart v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Waters v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HolsenbeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Clements v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Mathis v. BlanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Davis v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Troup v. LodenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API