Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Blanks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1956No. 19159PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

1. We will first deal with the defendant Albert H. Davis’ general demurrer, which the trial judge sustained. The petition alleges that the relation of attorney and client existed between the defendants Blanks and Davis, and that the former knew of fraudulent acts which had been committed for the purpose of defeating the plaintiff’s right to alimony. It is well settled that notice to an attorney is notice to the client employing him, and that knowledge of an attorney is knowledge of his client, when such notice and knowledge come to the attorney in and about the subject matter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lewis v. FoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Ford v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Citizens Bank v. Citizens & So. BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Marshall v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tower Financial Services, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Caffey v. Russell (In Re Caffey)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2008
  3. Austin v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Kouros v. SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Thornton v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API