Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Roussalis

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1989No. 88-282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice, Retired.

This is an action in tort for the alleged negligence of appellant Kelly as a real estate agent in advising appellee Roussalis that real property purchased by appellee at a sheriffs foreclosure sale was the same property previously shown by Kelly to ap-pellee when in fact it was not. Appellant McNamara Realty is the real estate broker which Kelly was representing. The district court found in favor of appellee and a judgment was entered accordingly.

Appellant Kelly represents the issues to be:

I. Whether the trial court erred in finding that appellant Kelly was operating…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Beard v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. SinclairWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Blessing v. PittmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andersen,. v. Two Dot Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Fowler v. Westair Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Paulson v. AndicoecheaWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kirkwood v. KellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API