Legal Opinion

Paulson v. Andicoechea

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1996No. 95-300PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

The issue presented in this ease is whether appellee owes appellant a duty to clear snow and ice from a parking lot. Finding that the natural accumulation rule bars imposition of such a duty under the specific facts of this case, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

ISSUES

Appellant presents the following issue:

I.May the natural accumulation rule serve as a foundation for summary judgment in the face of specific common law and statutory duties which mandate the removal of snow and ice fl-om the property where a citizen was hurt?

Appellee states, the issues:

I.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Beard v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sherman v. Platte CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Eiselein v. K-Mart, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Selby v. Conquistador Apartments, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McNeill Family Trust v. Centura BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Valance v. VI-Doug, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Pinnacle Bank v. VillaWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. RB, Jr., an infant, by and through his next friends, Robby & Corrina Brown v. Big Horn County School District No. 3Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API