Paulson v. Andicoechea
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
The issue presented in this ease is whether appellee owes appellant a duty to clear snow and ice from a parking lot. Finding that the natural accumulation rule bars imposition of such a duty under the specific facts of this case, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.
ISSUES
Appellant presents the following issue:
I.May the natural accumulation rule serve as a foundation for summary judgment in the face of specific common law and statutory duties which mandate the removal of snow and ice fl-om the property where a citizen was hurt?
Appellee states, the issues:
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Beard v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Sherman v. Platte CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Eiselein v. K-Mart, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Selby v. Conquistador Apartments, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- McNeill Family Trust v. Centura BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Valance v. VI-Doug, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Pinnacle Bank v. VillaWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- RB, Jr., an infant, by and through his next friends, Robby & Corrina Brown v. Big Horn County School District No. 3Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.