Legal Opinion

Kirkwood v. Kelly

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1990No. 89-237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice, Retired.

Appellants sued appellees charging that Kelly (appellee), agent for McNamara (ap-pellee), negligently failed to advise appellants that Roussalis intended to purchase their home at a foreclosure sale. Appellants also claimed that Roussalis would have purchased their home for $600,000 or more and the current value has dropped to $400,000, leaving them damaged in the sum of $200,000. The complaint was later amended to charge that, had Kelly properly performed his fiduciary duty as a real estate salesman to the Kirkwoods (appellants), they would have sold their property to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeWald v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Kelly v. RoussalisWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners Ex Rel. Teton County Sheriff's Department v. BassettWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Richardson v. SchaubWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Richardson v. SchaubWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API