Legal Opinion

Brinton v. Haight

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1994No. 20461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an action brought by respondents James R. Brinton and Patricia J. Brinton to recover on a promissory note and to foreclose a deed of trust which secures the note. The makers of the note, G. W. Haight and W. Dea Haight, appeal the district court’s award of attorney fees and costs and of prejudgment interest accrued after the Haights had tendered payment of the full balance owed on the note. We conclude that the tender of full payment, made approximately seven months prior to commencement of this action and twenty-six months before judgment, halted further accrual of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lowe v. HarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. MacY v. Brown.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indian Springs LLC v. Indian Springs Land Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n N.D. v. Citimortgage, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. U.S. Bank National Association N.D. v. Citimortgage, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API