Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Sumner
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
This dispute between two insurance companies turns on which of two vehicle dealers — Automaster Motor Co., which is insured by defendant Acadia Insurance Company, or Carey’s *573Auto Sales, which is insured by plaintiff Concord General Mutual Insurance Company — owned a certain Honda automobile when it was in an accident in which an employee of Carey’s was injured. The trial court ruled that the vehicle was owned by Carey’s and, thus, that Concord was obligated to cover the damages from the injuries to the employee. We affirm.
Automaster purchased the Honda vehicle from a private owner and sold it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brennan v. Town of ColchesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. RossalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Heinrich v. Titus-Will Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies v. BlaisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zlotoff Foundation, Inc. v. Town of South HeroSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020