Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. G. A. K.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 2009No. 070044J; Petition Number 070044J02; A139303; 070043J; Petition Number 070043J02; A139305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

In these consolidated cases, the state appeals from judgments dismissing its petitions for dependency jurisdiction over the parties’ children, R and E.1 ORS 419A.200(1). The state argues that the trial court erred in (1) finding that the state had committed discovery violations under ORS 419B.881, (2) precluding the admission of evidence as sanctions for those alleged violations, and (3) dismissing the state’s petitions with prejudice. We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering that the evidence be excluded. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

This appeal involves…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. D. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. J. E. D. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. HyltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Dep't of Human Servs. v. R. A. B. (In re G. D.-J.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. J. E. D. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API