Arnold v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Jackson Probate Court. Tried before Hon. Wit. B. Bridges. The facts are stated in the opinion. cited, Potts v. Coleman, 86 Ala. 94; Same Case, 67 Ala. 221; Lipscomb v. Lelemos, 68 Ala. 592; 86 Ala. 94; 67 Ala. 221; 68 Ala. 592. — On settlement of his accounts administrator is chargeable with a debt due from himself to the decedent. — P-urdom v. Tipton, 9 Ala. 914; Miller v. Irby’s Adrnr., 63 Ala. 477; 1. Buck. 967; 3 Buck. 396.
1Opinion of the CourtTyson, J.
— On the 6th day of May, 1896, appellant was appointed administrator of the estate of his father, J. J. Arnold, Sr., who died on the 2nd day of April just preceding. On July 17, 1896, an order was entered removing him as administrator and revoking the letters granted to him on account of his failure to give a new bond in compliance with the former order of the court.
On the 6th day of February, 1897, the probate court appointed H. C. Arnold administrator de bonis non.
On July 17th, 1897, the appellant filed his accounts for final settlement of his administration and the 27th of August following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Potts v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Miller v. Irby's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Potts v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Lipscomb v. DeLemosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Connolly's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- McEwen v. FletcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. RainsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Copeland v. LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Haldeman v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.