Haldeman v. Martin
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
The question is whether the defendants’ pos session of the note, under the facts of the case, is presumptive evidence of either payment or gift. Plaintiff’s intestate, J. F. Strasser, died August 23, 1924. Defendants, John T. Martin and Leona Martin, are husband and wife. Leona is the daughter of intestate. On March 15, 1920, defendants executed to intestate their promissory note for $14,000, with interest payable March 1, 1930. The petition alleges payment of 'interest to and including March 15, 1924. Intestate lived at his own home until three or four weeks before his death, when he went to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grey v. . GreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Maxler v. HawkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Union Trust & Savings Bank v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Clymer v. GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Grimes v. HilliaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of CollierMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- Stewart v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Hamilton v. BethelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- McCaslin v. WillisMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
- Hollon v. Weatherford's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.