Legal Opinion

American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Rains

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1926No. 7 Div. 663PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The chief issue of fact ■OH' the trial of this case was whether the ■assured, under whose policy plaintiff claims as beneficiary, was in sound health at the time the policy was delivered to him — that being an express condition to the validity and operation of the policy.

On this issue the trial court did not err in allowing several lay witnesses to testify that at and about the time in question the assured appeared to be healthy, this, not being deemed the expression of an opinion, hut the statement of a fact open to ordinary observation, as held in numerous cases. National Order, etc.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Milton v. RowlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Barker v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Bennett v. FailSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Fountain v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. v. CalvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Wilson v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Vaughn v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Southern Life Health Ins. Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. HanbackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API