Legal Opinion
Tatko Bros. Slate Co. v. Hannon
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided November 22, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 1836PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, District Judge.
Statement of the Case
This is an action for patent infringement, arising under Title 35 U.S.C. § 281. Plaintiff’s patent is No. 2,693,926. The complaint was filed on May 13, 1955. Following a stipulation for extension of time for filing the answer, on July 9, 1955, the defendant answered, denying infringement and denying the validity of the plaintiff’s patent (No. 2,693,926). The defendant counterclaimed against the plaintiff for damages, on the theory of unfair competition. Defendant also sought a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. On June 29, 1956, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tatko Bros. Slate Co., Inc. v. Matthew HannonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Tatko Bros. Slate Co., Inc. v. Matthew HannonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Tatko Bros. Slate Co., Inc. v. Matthew HannonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959