Legal Opinion

DiProspero v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 6, 1973No. File No. 95325Published

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The plaintiff owns commercial premises at 51 Danbury Road, Wilton. She leased the premises in February, 1969, to Matthew Piazza for use as a clothing store. As part of the leasing agreement, Piazza was required to secure fire insurance coverage on the structure, naming the plaintiff as a coinsured as her interest might appear.

Piazza did procure the issuance of a policy by the defendant Nationwide, for a three-year term, from March 6, 1969 to March 6, 1972, in the sum of $20,000. The policy named Piazza, his associate, William Pinciaro, and the plaintiff as coassureds as their interest might…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Campbell v. RockefellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Rood v. RussoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Chanosky v. City Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API