Legal Opinion
Parker v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 28, 1983No. 429-82CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which comes before the court opposed by plaintiff proceeding pro se.
FACTS
Recounting the facts of this controversy is hampered by the lack of a complete factual chronology. Certain of plaintiff’s medical records from March 1965 to September 1973 have been missing for over nine years, and other personnel records, for a shorter period. The following recapitulation is taken from plaintiff's 27-page petition and exhibits thereto; the exhibits plaintiff appended to his response to defendant's motion to dismiss; a series…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Hubert Ashe v. Robert S. McNamara Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Robert T. Mathis, Sr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Mitchell Van Bourg v. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Laughlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Baskett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Schmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Bellamy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.