Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 8, 1983No. 139-83CPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This military pay case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant contends that plaintiffs’ claim is barred by this court’s six-year statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, as amended by the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, Pub.L. No. 97-164, § 139(a), 96 Stat. 43 (1982), and by the doctrine of laches. After opposing summary judgment, plaintiff moved to dismiss without prejudice. Argument has been heard on the latter motion.

FACTS

Plaintiffs John Alexander Schmidt, John Richard Peter Sheehan, and Harry Clifford Thompson were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gosa v. MaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Hubert Ashe v. Robert S. McNamara Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  5. Robert T. Mathis, Sr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Agee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Noel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Torres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Mitchell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API