Legal Opinion
Winston v. Minkin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1974No. 311PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented on appeal:
1. Whether or not the listing contract, signed by but one of the co-owners of said property, is in compliance with sec. 240.10, Stats., and enforceable.
2. Whether the plaintiff procured a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase upon the terms specified by the owner in the listing contract or acceptable to him.
Compliance with sec. 2U0.10, Stats.
The defendant contends that the listing contract was not in compliance with sec. 240.10, Stats., and unenforceable in that it was signed by but one of the co-owners of the property. This contention is without merit.
Se…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Peter M. Chalik & Associates v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Wauwatosa Realty Co. v. PaarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Hilboldt v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Dean v. WendebergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Thorp Sales Corp. v. Gyuro Grading Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Rollie Winter Agency, Inc. v. First Central Mortgage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.