Legal Opinion

Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Palmer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1975No. 193, 194 (1974)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

While three grounds for demurrer were asserted, the trial court granted the demurrer of respondent on the single ground that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the third-party complaints filed by appellants. The sole question before us is whether the trial court erred in so holding.

The proper procedure to make claims against the estate of a deceased person in this state is to file a claim against the estate in the probate proceedings. It is the duty of the county court in probate to “. . . receive, examine and adjust the claims and demands of all persons against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cawker v. DreutzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Milwaukee v. DrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Polanski v. Town of Eagle PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Reque v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Davis v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chas. H. Steffey, Inc. v. Estate of SavainSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API