Legal Opinion

Cairo Pickle Co. v. Muggridge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1949No. 16838PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Under the pleadings and the evidence in this case, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in granting a temporary injunction.

No. 16838. OCTOBER 12, 1949.

A petition for temporary and permanent injunction was filed by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error, alleging that Cairo Pickle Company was using a sewer line from its plant to Little Tired Creek, into which it was discharging the waste water from its plant; and that this waste water contained salt, parts of vegetables, worms, and other matters, all of which endangered the health of the defendants in error, as well as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Hodges v. Pine Product Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Horton v. FultonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Woodall v. Cartersville Mining & Manganese Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Lowe v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. Vickers v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Wright v. Intercounty Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. KINGSLEY MILL CORPORATION v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Pitman v. GriffethSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API