Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Pine Product Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1910PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Bawlings. Tattnall superior court. April 6, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant for damages, making, among others, substantially the following allegations; Defendant is engaged in the business of extracting from wood, at its plant, “rosin, turpentine, creosote, etc., including all the poisonous gases and chemicals contained in pine wood.” From an artesian well the defendant pumps every day thousands of gallons of-water, which is discharged into a ditch used to convey the water into Cedar creek. “The said poisonous gases and chemicals extracted from the said wood contaminates the said artesian water as used and discharged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Price v. High Shoals Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Parker v. American Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Satterfield v. RowanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Muncie Pulp Co. v. KeeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Horton v. FultonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Southland Co. v. AARON, ET UX.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Vickers v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Piedmont Cotton Mills, Inc. v. General Warehouse No. Two, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Pelham Phosphate Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API