Legal Opinion
KINGSLEY MILL CORPORATION v. Edmonds
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 3, 1951No. 17583PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
1. The trial court is vested with a wide discretion in the grant or refusal of interlocutory injunctions, which will not be controlled by this court unless abused. Code, § 55-108; Jones v. Camp, 208 Ga. 164 (1) (65 S. E. 2d, 596).
2. A lower riparian owner is entitled to have water flow upon his land in its natural slate free from adulteration. Code, §§ 85-1301, 105-1407; Satterfield v. Rowan, 83 Ga. 187 (2) (9 S. E. 677); City of Elberton v. Hobbs, 121 Ga. 749 (3) (49 S. E. 779); Hodges v. Pine Product Co., 135 Ga. 134 (68 S. E. 1107); Robertson v. Arnold, 182 Ga.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hodges v. Pine Product Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Satterfield v. RowanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- City of Elberton v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Robertson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Cairo Pickle Co. v. MuggridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Vickers v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Mayor &C. of Athens v. Gamma Delta Chapter House Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Johansen v. Combustion EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999