Romiski Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
In this appeal by claimant from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, denying his claims for unemployment compensation, claimant did not file a brief or appear when the case was called for argument, although he had been given due notice of the time and place. The appeal will be dismissed, as of course, under our Rule 58.
However, we have examined the record,-and it appears that claimant, on his own testimony, was clearly ineligible for benefits.
Claimant was last employed as a machine operator by the Melody Shoe Corporation, Wilkes-Barre, Penn*108sylvania. He had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Devlin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Pinto Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- D'Yantone Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Weiland Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hanna Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Masouskie v. Hammond Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. SanchezCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Palovich Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.