Koepke v. Martinez
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice RODRIGUEZ.
Following a dog attack, appellant, James A. Koepke, was sued by appellees Andres Martinez (Andres) and his wife Maria Martinez (Maria) 1 under various theories of recovery, including negligence and bystander claims. Finding Koepke sixty percent negligent and Andres forty percent negligent, the jury awarded zero damages. Appellees filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV)- The trial court granted appellees’ motion for JNOV and entered a judgment awarding appellees approximately $200,000. The trial court overruled Koepke’s motion for new…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Ackermann v. VordenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- John Schack and Debbie Schack v. Property Owners Association of Sunset Bay and Timothy Raub, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2018
- Kennamer v. ESTATE OF NOBLITT, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
- Labaj v. VanHouten, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
- Live Oak Insurance Agency v. Shoemake, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Adjusters & Loss Consultants Group, Inc. v. Johnson International Materials, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.