Legal Opinion

Koepke v. Martinez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 26, 2002No. 13-01-433-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice RODRIGUEZ.

Following a dog attack, appellant, James A. Koepke, was sued by appellees Andres Martinez (Andres) and his wife Maria Martinez (Maria) 1 under various theories of recovery, including negligence and bystander claims. Finding Koepke sixty percent negligent and Andres forty percent negligent, the jury awarded zero damages. Appellees filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV)- The trial court granted appellees’ motion for JNOV and entered a judgment awarding appellees approximately $200,000. The trial court overruled Koepke’s motion for new…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ackermann v. VordenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. John Schack and Debbie Schack v. Property Owners Association of Sunset Bay and Timothy Raub, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2018
  2. Kennamer v. ESTATE OF NOBLITT, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. Labaj v. VanHouten, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  4. Live Oak Insurance Agency v. Shoemake, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Adjusters & Loss Consultants Group, Inc. v. Johnson International Materials, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API